SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Editors as gatekeepers of responsible science
10 references·2 citing·50 second hop
Editors as gatekeepers of responsible science (2010)Editors as gatekeepers of responsible sci…The role of statistical reviewer in biomedical scientific journal (2009)The role of statistical revie…Statistical errors in manuscripts submitted to Biochemia Medica journal (2009)Statistical errors in manuscr…Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2009)Retractions: Guidance from th…Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2009)Retractions: guidance from th…Threats to the Integrity of the Croatian Medical Journal (2007)Threats to the Integrity of t…Role of editors and journals in detecting and preventing scientific misconduct: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. (2007)Role of editors and journals …Five-Year Report of Croatian Medical Journal's Research Integrity Editor - Policy, Policing, or Policing Policy. (2006)Five-Year Report of Croatian …Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors (2006)Ethical dilemmas in scientifi…Good editorial practice: editors as educators. (2001)Good editorial practice: edit…Small scientific journals from small countries: breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy. (1999)Small scientific journals fro…The Existence of Stealth Corrections in Scientific Literature—A Threat to Scientific Integrity (2025)The Existence of Stealth Corr…Peer Review in Scholarly Biomedical Journals: a Few Things that Make a Big Difference (2013)Peer Review in Scholarly Biom…Croatian Medical Journal introduces culture, control, and the study of research integrity. (2001)Producing a scientific journal in a small scientific community: an author-helpful policy. (2004)Prevalence of plagiarism among medical students. (2005)Principles and Ethics in Scientific Communication in Biomedicine (2013)Plagiarism under a Magnifying-Glass. (2017)Phenomena of Retraction (1998)Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case (2006)Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes? (2006)A Comprehensive Analysis of Articles Retracted Between 2004 and 2013 from Biomedical Literature – A Call for Reforms (2014)Concern noted: a descriptive study of editorial expressions of concern in PubMed and PubMed Central (2017)Research ethics: a profile of retractions from world class universities (2021)The Misuse of Statistics: Concepts, Tools, and a Research Agenda (2002)Misuse of standard error of the mean (sem) when reporting variability of a sample. A critical evaluation of four anaesthesia journals (2003)What we need to know when calculating the coefficient of correlation? (2007)Quality of reporting statistics in two Indian pharmacology journals (2011)Assessment of Submitted Manuscripts in Medical Sciences According to Statistical Errors (2012)Narrative Review of Statistical Reporting Checklists, Mandatory Statistical Editing, and Rectifying Common Problems in the Reporting of Scientific Articles (2016)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Different Patterns of Duplicate Publication (2004)Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth (2005)Plagiarism in Scientific Publications (2009)Responding to Possible Plagiarism (2009)A review of the literature on ethical issues related to scientific authorship (2020)Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2004)Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2004)Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity (2007)The Purpose of Scientific Journals: Small is Important (2009)An Analysis on the Research Ethics Cases Managed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Between 1997 and 2010 (2011)Do Croatian open access journals support ethical research? Content analysis of instructions to authors (2015)Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies. (1986)Statistical reviewing for medical journals (1998)GUIDELINES TO STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF DATA FROM RATING SCALES AND QUESTIONNAIRES (2001)Questionable research practices following pre-registration (2019)Reporting of data analysis methods in psychiatric journals: Trends from 1996 to 2018 (2019)CODECHECK: an Open Science initiative for the independent execution of computations underlying research articles during peer review to improve reproducibility (2021)Lost Science in the Third World (1995)Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews (1996)Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Academic misconduct among medical students in a post‐communist country (2004)Manuscript editing as a way of teaching academic writing: Experience from a small scientific journal (2005)Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals (2021)An analysis of the validity of retraction annotation in pubmed and the web of science (2017)Post retraction citations among manuscripts reporting a radiology-imaging diagnostic method (2019)A systematic review of retractions in biomedical research publications: reasons for retractions and their citations in Indian affiliations (2023)Have Online International Medical Journals Made Local Journals Obsolete? (2006)Plagiarism detection – quality management tool for all scientific journals (2012)Rhetorical Structure of Research Articles in Agricultural Science (2014)Misconduct, Marginality and Editorial Practices in Management, Business and Economics Journals (2016)Scientific misconduct at an elite medical institute: The role of competing institutional logics and fragmented control (2018)Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Small scientific journals from small countries: breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy.105 cited
  • 2006Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors75 cited
  • 2001Good editorial practice: editors as educators.71 cited
  • 2009Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)67 cited
  • 2009Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)60 cited
  • 2007Role of editors and journals in detecting and preventing scientific misconduct: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.52 cited
  • 2007Threats to the Integrity of the Croatian Medical Journal30 cited
  • 2009Statistical errors in manuscripts submitted to Biochemia Medica journal28 cited
  • 2006Five-Year Report of Croatian Medical Journal's Research Integrity Editor - Policy, Policing, or Policing Policy.24 cited
  • 2009The role of statistical reviewer in biomedical scientific journal21 cited

Cited by

  • 2013Peer Review in Scholarly Biomedical Journals: a Few Things that Make a Big Difference11 cited
  • 2025The Existence of Stealth Corrections in Scientific Literature—A Threat to Scientific Integrity9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work