Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How do “Emerging” Donors Differ from “Traditional” Donors?

13 references·1 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1937The Nature of the Firm23,826 cited
2008Explaining social behavior: more nuts and bolts for the social sciences834 cited
2008Whose aid? Whose influence? China, emerging donors and the silent revolution in development assistance711 cited
2001Prosperity and violence: the political economy of development537 cited
2007China in Africa464 cited
2008Reinventing foreign aid378 cited
2006Will ‘Emerging Donors’ Change the Face of International Co‐operation?338 cited
2006Proliferation and fragmentation: Transactions costs and the value of aid308 cited
2008Institutions and Development227 cited
2005Why Do Aid Agencies Exist?175 cited
2010Emerging Donors in International Development Assistance39 cited
2005Focus‐Pocus? Thinking Critically about Whether Aid Organizations Should Do Fewer Things in Fewer Countries26 cited
2015Aid Effectiveness in Cambodia19 cited

Cited by

2022Why Does a Country Assist Another?The Origins and Evolution of Development Assistance, as well as Donor Motivations1 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work