SStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Biomarker studies: a call for a comprehensive biomarker study registry · Study

ReviewBiomarker studies: a call for a comprehensive biomarker study registry

Fabrice André2011

Review2011

Biomarker studies: a call for a comprehensive biomarker study registry

Fabrice André · Lisa M. McShane · Stefan Michiels · David F. Ransohoff · Douglas G. Altman · Jorge Sergio Reis-Filho +2 more

117 citations·0/0 files stored·Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 117 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials 2005Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases 1996The CONSORT Statement 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials

Cited by

2013Bias in Associations of Emerging Biomarkers With Cardiovascular Disease 2016Bias in Peripheral Depression Biomarkers 2016Perspectives on making big data analytics work for oncology 2014The Time Has Come to Register Diagnostic and Prognostic Research 2017Did the reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers improve since the introduction of REMARK guideline? A comparison of reporting in published articles 2018Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in oncology: a systematic review

Details

Year2011

Typereview

Published2011-03-01

VenueNature Reviews Clinical Oncology

ISSN-L1759-4774

Languageen

Citations117

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.4

openalex_workW2106995472

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2012Correction: Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic Reviews

2016Prevention of selective outcome reporting: let us start from the beginning