SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Accounting for baseline differences in meta-analysis
14 references·0 citing·42 second hop
Accounting for baseline differences in meta-analysis (2014)Accounting for baseline differences in me…Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Introduction to Meta‐AnalysisDemystifying fixed and random effects meta-analysis (2014)Demystifying fixed and random…Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Interpretation of random effe…Meta‐Regression (2009)Meta‐RegressionChapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and…Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses (2008)Analysing Data and Undertakin…Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factors (2004)Meta-regression detected asso…Baseline risk as predictor of treatment benefit: three clinical meta-re-analyses (2000)Baseline risk as predictor of…Analysing the relationship between treatment effect and underlying risk in meta-analysis: comparison and development of approaches (2000)Analysing the relationship be…An empirical study of the effect of the control rate as a predictor of treatment efficacy in meta-analysis of clinical trials (1998)An empirical study of the eff…Investigating underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analysis (1997)Investigating underlying risk…The relation between treatment benefit and underlying risk in meta-analysis (1996)The relation between treatmen…THE POPULATION RISK AS AN EXPLANATORY VARIABLE IN RESEARCH SYNTHESIS OF CLINICAL TRIALS (1996)THE POPULATION RISK AS AN EXP…Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)Systematic Review: Why source…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (2002)Socioeconomic Inequalities in Depression: A Meta-Analysis (2003)Long-term mental health of war-refugees: a systematic literature review (2015)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)The role of masculinity in men's help-seeking for depression: A systematic review (2016)Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity (2017)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013 (2014)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)A random‐effects regression model for meta‐analysis (1995)Expected Value of Sample Information Calculations in Medical Decision Modeling (2004)Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurement of hippocampal volume in posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis (2005)Prospective Associations between Depression and Obesity for Adolescent Males and Females- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies (2016)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading (1995)Can meta-analysis help target interventions at individuals most likely to benefit? (2005)Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study (2006)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Covariate heterogeneity in meta‐analysis: Criteria for deciding between meta‐regression and individual patient data (2006)Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature (2012)Most published meta-regression analyses based on aggregate data suffer from methodological pitfalls: a meta-epidemiological study (2021)QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1 (1987)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Investigating causes of heterogeneity in systematic reviews (2002)Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary (2005)Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems (2012)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)A hands-on practical tutorial on performing meta-analysis with Stata (2014)Random-Effects Meta-analysis (2018)Introduction to Meta-Analysis (2021)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021Introduction to Meta‐Analysis9,785 cited
  • 2011Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses2,872 cited
  • 2008Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses2,780 cited
  • 2008Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses1,795 cited
  • 1994Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated1,016 cited
  • 2004Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factors245 cited
  • 1997Investigating underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analysis227 cited
  • 1998An empirical study of the effect of the control rate as a predictor of treatment efficacy in meta-analysis of clinical trials217 cited
  • 1996The relation between treatment benefit and underlying risk in meta-analysis172 cited
  • 2014Demystifying fixed and random effects meta-analysis157 cited
  • 1996THE POPULATION RISK AS AN EXPLANATORY VARIABLE IN RESEARCH SYNTHESIS OF CLINICAL TRIALS128 cited
  • 2000Analysing the relationship between treatment effect and underlying risk in meta-analysis: comparison and development of approaches102 cited
  • 2000Baseline risk as predictor of treatment benefit: three clinical meta-re-analyses82 cited
  • 2009Meta‐Regression68 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.