SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Critical Appraisal of Published Systematic Reviews Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Telemedicine Studies
9 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Critical Appraisal of Published Systematic Reviews Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Telemedicine Studies (2014)Critical Appraisal of Published Systemati…Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic …Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature (2009)Can economic evaluation in te…Who will appraise the appraisers?—The paper, the instrument and the user (2007)Who will appraise the apprais…Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005)Methods for the Economic Eval…Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (2005)Criteria list for assessment …Development and Validation of a Grading System for the Quality of Cost-Effectiveness Studies (2003)Development and Validation of…Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Validation of an index of the…How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) (1997)Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire (2004)How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective (2006)Exploring the use of asynchronous online discussion in health care education: A literature review (2013)Evaluating Approaches to Quality Assessment in Library and Information Science LIS Systematic Reviews: A Methodology Review (2016)Akufo and Ibarapa (1965)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996)Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications (2008)Propuesta de guía para la evaluación económica aplicada a las tecnologías sanitarias (2009)WHO Guide for standardisation of economic evaluations of immunization programmes (2009)Recommendations for Reporting Cost-effectiveness Analyses (1996)Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests (1994)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions (2011)Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)Thresholds for the cost–effectiveness of interventions: alternative approaches (2014)Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials II—An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force Report (2015)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force (2022)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (2006)AdViSHE: A Validation-Assessment Tool of Health-Economic Models for Decision Makers and Model Users (2015)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 (2002)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2005Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes13,647 cited
  • 2013Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement1,776 cited
  • 2005Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria858 cited
  • 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
  • 2003Development and Validation of a Grading System for the Quality of Cost-Effectiveness Studies311 cited
  • 2009Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature103 cited
  • 2007Who will appraise the appraisers?—The paper, the instrument and the user21 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work