A Systematic Literature Review of the Applications of Q-Technique and Its Methodology

Fiona Dziopa · Kathy Ahern

233 citations0/0 files storedMethodology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Q Methodology Applications Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Qualitative Research Methods and Applications

Abstract

Q-methodology is a technique incorporating the benefits of both qualitative and quantitative research. Q-method involves Q-sorting, a method of data collection and factor analysis, to assess subjective (qualitative) information. The use of Q-sorting and factor analysis has often resulted in the misconception that Q-methodology involves psychometric or quantitative assessment, although Q as a methodology actually enables the systematic assessment of qualitative data. Misconceptions regarding Q have resulted in a heterogeneous collection of Q-applications in the extant literature, which has obscured the fundamental principles of Q-methodology. The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic review of Q-based research to investigate the criteria researchers have used to develop Q-studies. Published research studies between January 2008 and December 2008 that employed Q-techniques and methodology were assessed. Data were extracted and synthesized through the development and use of the Assessment and Review Instrument for Q-methodology (ARIQ). Fourteen research studies met the inclusion criteria for the review. The Q-methodological studies were disparate in their application of terminology, instrument development, and factor analysis, although data extraction and synthesis processes revealed two types of studies: those which aimed to apply conventional Q-methodology and those which applied variations of Q-techniques. It is concluded that variations of Q-technique and its methodology are unavoidable. However, this does not obviate the need for researchers to explicitly state their rationale for decisions to deviate from conventional Q-methodology if they are to produce demonstrably valid research. The review instrument (ARIQ) developed for this review will facilitate this end.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 233 citations exist upstream.

References

1974Foundations of Behavioral Research 1967Foundations of Behavioral Research 1982Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science 1995Rethinking Methods in Psychology 1961The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research.2005Doing Q ethodology: theory, method and interpretation 1993A Primer on Q Methodology 1955The Study of Behavior: Q-Technique and Its Methodology.

Cited by

2015Mixed Method Lessons Learned From 80 Years of Q Methodology 2016Bootstrapping Q Methodology to Improve the Understanding of Human Perspectives 2019Technological frames in public administration: What do public managers think of big data?2023Methodological choices in applications of Q methodology: A systematic literature review 2013Overly ambitious: contributions and current status of Q methodology 2020Exploring variety in factors that stimulate project managers to address sustainability issues

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.