SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A survey of newly appointed consultants' attitudes towards research fraud
3 references·16 citing·46 second hop
A survey of newly appointed consultants' attitudes towards research fraud (2001)A survey of newly appointed consultants' …A pilot study of biomedical traineesʼ perceptions concerning research ethics (1992)A pilot study of biomedical t…Newton and the Fudge Factor (1973)Newton and the Fudge FactorHas Mendel's work been rediscovered? (1936)Has Mendel's work been redisc…Research integrity and academic medicine: the pressure to publish and research misconduct (2024)Research integrity and academ…Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research (2024)Is something rotten in the st…Misconduct in biomedical research: A meta-analysis and systematic review (2023)Misconduct in biomedical rese…Research Integrity Among PhD Students at the Faculty of Medicine: A Comparison of Three Scandinavian Universities (2020)Research Integrity Among PhD …Knowledge and attitudes of physicians toward research ethics and scientific misconduct in Lebanon (2020)Knowledge and attitudes of ph…Questionable research practices among Brazilian psychological researchers: Results from a replication study and an international comparison (2019)Questionable research practic…In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities (2017)In Their Own Words: Research …A Cross-Sectional Survey Study to Assess Prevalence and Attitudes Regarding Research Misconduct among Investigators in the Middle East (2017)A Cross-Sectional Survey Stud…Applying criminological theory to academic fraud (2015)Applying criminological theor…Estimating the prevalence of researcher misconduct: a study of UK academics within biological sciences (2014)Estimating the prevalence of …Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices with Incentives for Truth-Telling (2012)Measuring the Prevalence of Q…Factors Associated with Research Wrongdoing in Nigeria (2012)Factors Associated with Resea…Expert bias in peer review (2011)Expert bias in peer reviewScientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: a national survey: Table 1 (2007)Scientific misconduct from th…Research Misconduct (2003)Research MisconductMisconduct in medical research: whose responsibility? (2003)Misconduct in medical researc…Mendel's principles of heredity / by W. Bateson. (1909)Mendel's Principles of Heredity (1913)The art of scientific investigation (1957)Does psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer. (1994)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Sir Isaac Newton’s Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World (1934)Should the History of Science Be Rated X? (1974)Advocacy and Objectivity in Science (1979)Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine (2012)Ethical Problems in Academic Research (1993)Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research (1996)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Research Coordinators' Experiences With Scientific Misconduct and Research Integrity (2009)Researcher Requests for Inappropriate Analysis and Reporting: A U.S. Survey of Consulting Biostatisticians (2018)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct (2016)Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) — a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science (2021)Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning (1993)Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys (2006)Scientific Dishonesty (2015)Unethical Authorship in Scientific Publications (A Review of the Problem) (2019)Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China (2020)Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (1997)Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (1997)Fraud in Medical Research (2000)Using Criminalization and Due Process to Reduce Scientific Misconduct (2005)Cultural Variation and Dominance in a Globalised Knowledge-Economy: Towards a Culture-Sensitive Research Paradigm in the Science of Giftedness (2012)Social Structure and Anomie (1938)Social Structure and Anomie (2017)Perceptions of occurrence of research misconduct and related factors among Kenyan investigators engaged in HIV research (2020)Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers (2021)Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers’ Perceptions in Spain (2021)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)P-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results (2014)Game Theory for Data Science: Eliciting Truthful Information (2017)Misrepresentation and Responsibility in Medical Research (1987)Gut in 1999 (1999)Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries (1999)Authorship: an ethical dilemma of science (2005)Publicación duplicada o redundante: ¿podemos permitírnoslo? (2005)Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey (1996)Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys (2014)Scientific Misconduct (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1936Has Mendel's work been rediscovered?344 cited
  • 1973Newton and the Fudge Factor161 cited
  • 1992A pilot study of biomedical traineesʼ perceptions concerning research ethics137 cited

Cited by

  • 2007Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: a national survey: Table 158 cited
  • 2012Factors Associated with Research Wrongdoing in Nigeria57 cited
  • 2017A Cross-Sectional Survey Study to Assess Prevalence and Attitudes Regarding Research Misconduct among Investigators in the Middle East56 cited
  • 2003Research Misconduct55 cited
  • 2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices with Incentives for Truth-Telling53 cited
  • 2003Misconduct in medical research: whose responsibility?44 cited
  • 2014Estimating the prevalence of researcher misconduct: a study of UK academics within biological sciences42 cited
  • 2019Questionable research practices among Brazilian psychological researchers: Results from a replication study and an international comparison34 cited
  • 2020Knowledge and attitudes of physicians toward research ethics and scientific misconduct in Lebanon33 cited
  • 2024Research integrity and academic medicine: the pressure to publish and research misconduct32 cited
  • 2020Research Integrity Among PhD Students at the Faculty of Medicine: A Comparison of Three Scandinavian Universities

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

31 cited
  • 2011Expert bias in peer review30 cited
  • 2024Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research30 cited
  • 2015Applying criminological theory to academic fraud30 cited
  • 2023Misconduct in biomedical research: A meta-analysis and systematic review27 cited
  • 2017In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities25 cited