SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Systematic reviews to evaluate diagnostic tests · Study

ReviewSystematic reviews to evaluate diagnostic tests

Khalid Saeed Khan2001

Review2001

Systematic reviews to evaluate diagnostic tests

Khalid Saeed Khan · Jacqueline Dinnes · Jos Kleijnen

93 citations·0/0 files stored·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Epidemiology Clinical practice guidelines implementation

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 93 citations exist upstream.

References

1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data 1968Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.1971Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.1999Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests 1995Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis 1987The Medical Review Article: State of the Science 1994Users' Guides to the Medical Literature 1994Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests

Cited by

2005A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools 2003Systematic reviews with individual patient data meta-analysis to evaluate diagnostic tests 2009Individual patient data meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic studies in obstetrics, gynaecology and reproductive medicine 2018Determining qualitative effect size ratings using a likelihood ratio scatter matrix in diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews 2003Electronic searching of the literature for systematic reviews of screening and diagnostic tests for preterm birth

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2001Systematic Reviews of Evaluations of Diagnostic and Screening Testsreview · 7 shared references 1998Systematic reviews of trials and other studies.article · 7 shared references 2000The Science of Systematic Reviewing Studies of Diagnostic Testsreview · 7 shared references 2009Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 7: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studiesreview · 6 shared references 2005Synthesizing medical evidence: systematic reviews and metaanalysesreview · 6 shared references 2009Individual patient data meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic studies in obstetrics, gynaecology and reproductive medicineother · 6 shared references

Details

Year2001

Typereview

Published2001-03-01

VenueEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

ISSN-L0028-2243

Languageen

Citations93

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00463-2

openalex_workW2114003975

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2005Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests: a guide to methods and application

2022Revisiones sistemáticas en cinco pasos: I. Cómo formular una pregunta para la que se pueda obtener una respuesta válida