Toward Addressing the Issues of Site Selection in District Effectiveness Research: A Two-Level Hierarchical Linear Growth Model

Alex J. Bowers

33 citations0/0 files storedEducational Administration Quarterly

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Educational Assessment and Improvement School Choice and Performance Educational Leadership and Practices

Abstract

Purpose: District effectiveness research (DER) is an emerging field concerned with identifying the organizational structures, administration, and leadership practices at the school district level that help districts find success with all of their students across the schools within the system. This work has mirrored much of the early school effectiveness research (SER). However, to date across the DER literature, site selection for in-depth studies of districts deemed “effective” has been haphazard and nonsystematic. This is problematic given the long history of critiques centered on site selection in SER. The purpose of this study is to address and adapt the critiques from SER to a method of site selection for DER and test the method using a large multiyear data set to identify districts that are significantly unusual and effective. Research Design: A two-level hierarchical linear growth model that nests multiple time points per district (Level 1) within districts (Level 2) was used to predict gains in district achievement for all school districts in the state of Ohio during a 7-year period, 2001-2002 through 2007-2008. Findings: Districts that statistically significantly outperformed their predicted gains in achievement, controlling for background and demographic variables over the period, are identified as possible sites for in-depth qualitative studies for DER in comparison to districts performing at the norm. Conclusions: This study proposes and tests a method for district identification in DER that addresses the critiques from SER through controlling for achievement covariates, modeling district gains over time, and examining the population of districts within an entire state.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 33 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research 1979Effective Schools for the Urban Poor 2003Leading Educational Change: reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership 2003Principal Leadership and School Performance: An Integration of Transformational and Instructional Leadership 1983Effective Schools: A Review 1997Assessing the Effects of School Resources on Student Performance: An Update 2003On the Specification and Estimation of the Production Function for Cognitive Achievement 2003Teacher Characteristics and Student Achievement Gains: A Review

Cited by

2016Principal Turnover: Are There Different Types of Principals Who Move From or Leave Their Schools? A Latent Class Analysis of the 2007–2008 Schools and Staffing Survey and the 2008–2009 Principal Follow-Up Survey 2017Pathways to the Principalship 2011Home-Town Values and High Accountability: A Texas Recipe for Districtwide Success in an Urban School District 2014Site selection in school district research: a measure of effectiveness using hierarchical longitudinal growth models of performance

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.