Development of a personality biodata measure to predict ethical decision making

Gregory G. Manley · Juan Benavidez · Kristen Dunn

17 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Managerial Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Ethics in Business and Education Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Personality Traits and Psychology

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop and test a measure designed to assess constructs that predict ethical decision making (EDM) among employees. Design/methodology/approach The approach was to target individual difference variables that are theoretically linked to EDM. This was done by generating biodata items/scales of the constructs of interest. Findings Two biodata scales were developed to measure locus of control and conscientiousness. Both of these scales had significant criterion‐related validities with EDM (rs=0.42 and 0.40, respectively) and predicted significant and unique variance of EDM beyond the variance predicted by trait‐based measures of the same constructs. Biodata scales exhibited little or no subgroup differences (less potential adverse impact). Research limitations/implications – Participants were working various jobs and a variety of settings, so results generalize to this eclectic population more so than one particular industry. Further research should attempt to examine effects in a specific applied setting. Practical implications This study outlines a method of item and scale development that produces homogonous scales that predict EDM and that can be tailored for specific organizational use. Originality/value The paper provides a theoretical rationale for why biodata methodology is superior to trait‐based measures and practical value for the use of biodata in measuring individual difference constructs.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.

References

1966Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.1991THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS 1991Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model 1991Measurement and Control of Response Bias 1993Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance 1979Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process.1984Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.1976Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research

Cited by

2011Testing the mediating role of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs in the relationship between sources of efficacy information and students achievement 2012Background Data: Use of Experiential Knowledge in Personnel Selection 2009Job satisfaction and job performance: is the relationship spurious?2010The effect of adverse impact in selection practices on organizational diversity: a field study 2010The Role of Individual Variables, Organizational Variables, and Moral Intensity Dimensions in Accountants’ Ethical Decision Making: A Study of Management Accounting in Libya

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.