SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Falsification of the Citation Impediment in the Taxonomic Literature
16 references·2 citing·43 second hop
A Falsification of the Citation Impediment in the Taxonomic Literature (2015)A Falsification of the Citation Impedimen…Trends in Biodiversity Research — A Bibliometric Assessment (2014)Trends in Biodiversity Resear…Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania (2014)Causes for the Persistence of…A taxonomy of motives to cite (2014)A taxonomy of motives to citeThe Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations (2013)The Assessment of Science: Th…Taxonomy: no decline, but inertia (2013)Taxonomy: no decline, but ine…Reforming research assessment (2013)Reforming research assessmentThe taxonomist - an endangered race. A practical proposal for its survival (2011)The taxonomist - an endangere…Biology Needs a Modern Assessment System for Professional Productivity (2011)Biology Needs a Modern Assess…When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings (2009)When Knowledge Wins: Transcen…What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)What do citation counts measu…The Misused Impact Factor (2008)The Misused Impact FactorThe case of impact factor versus taxonomy: a proposal (2006)The case of impact factor ver…Why impact factors don't work for taxonomy (2002)Why impact factors don't work…Challenges for taxonomy (2002)Challenges for taxonomyReliance on the citation index undermines the study of biodiversity (2000)Reliance on the citation inde…Impact factors aren't relevant to taxonomy (2000)Impact factors aren't relevan…Framing the future for taxonomic monography: Improving recognition, support, and access (2022)Framing the future for taxono…Scientometrics of Forest Health and Tree Diseases: An Overview (2016)Scientometrics of Forest Heal…The counting house (2002)Bang for Your Buck: Rejection Rates and Impact Factors in Ecological Journals (2008)A pervasive denigration of natural history misconstrues how biodiversity inventories and taxonomy underpin scientific knowledge (2009)Impact of the impact factor in biomedical research: its use and misuse. (2009)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Science in Action (1987)An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method (1999)Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication (2015)Important citation identification using sentiment analysis of in-text citations (2020)A decade of in-text citation analysis based on natural language processing and machine learning techniques: an overview of empirical studies (2021)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? (2004)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)Altmetrics: an analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media (2016)Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, h -index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia (2019)Systema naturae per regna tria naturae : secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis (1767)XVIII.—On the law which has regulated the introduction of new species (1855)A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia (2004)A taxonomic revision of the Saki monkeys, Pithecia Desmarest, 1804 (2014)Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taxonomy (2018)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Competitive Science: Is Competition Ruining Science? (2015)The Impact Factor Fallacy (2018)How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists (2020)The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields (1983)The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (2004)Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices (2005)Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism (2010)Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs (2011)It’s a Bittersweet Symphony, this Life: Fragile Academic Selves and Insecure Identities at Work (2013)Citation of taxonomic publications: the why, when, what and what not (2016)Are publications on zoological taxonomy under attack? (2021)Introduction (2004)Now is the time (2004)Systematics must Embrace Comparative Biology and Evolution, not Speed and Automation (2008)Cultural Psychology Today: Innovations and Oversights (2009)Citation count prediction (2011)Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior1,598 cited
  • 2009When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings852 cited
  • 2002Challenges for taxonomy547 cited
  • 2013The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations295 cited
  • 2014Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania196 cited
  • 2008The Misused Impact Factor181 cited
  • 2011The taxonomist - an endangered race. A practical proposal for its survival150 cited
  • 2014A taxonomy of motives to cite109 cited
  • 2002Why impact factors don't work for taxonomy98 cited
  • 2000Impact factors aren't relevant to taxonomy71 cited
  • 2013Taxonomy: no decline, but inertia69 cited
  • 2000Reliance on the citation index undermines the study of biodiversity64 cited
  • 2006The case of impact factor versus taxonomy: a proposal42 cited
  • 2013Reforming research assessment39 cited
  • 2014Trends in Biodiversity Research — A Bibliometric Assessment38 cited
  • 2011Biology Needs a Modern Assessment System for Professional Productivity

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

38 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Scientometrics of Forest Health and Tree Diseases: An Overview14 cited
  • 2022Framing the future for taxonomic monography: Improving recognition, support, and access12 cited