Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Reporting quality of abstracts in phase III clinical trials of systemic therapy in metastatic solid malignancies

16 references·2 citing·46 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited
2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
2001Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas.564 cited
1999Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles300 cited
2011Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial291 cited
2012Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis235 cited
1990A Cohort Study of Summary Reports of Controlled Trials202 cited
2012Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals140 cited
2008The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals133 cited
1993

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Presentation Deficiencies in structured medical abstracts

97 cited

2010Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals89 cited

2014Oncology trial abstracts showed suboptimal improvement in reporting: a comparative before-and-after evaluation using CONSORT for Abstract guidelines76 cited

2010Assessment of the Quality of Reporting in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Five Leading Chinese Medical Journals51 cited

Cited by

2020Quality of adverse event reporting in phase III randomized controlled trials of breast and colorectal cancer: A systematic review11 cited
2021Assessment of reporting quality in randomised controlled clinical trial abstracts of dental implantology published from 2014 to 201610 cited