Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Automating Risk of Bias Assessment for Clinical Trials

12 references·13 citing·50 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
2012Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies.668 cited
2012Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center530 cited
2005Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification410 cited
2009Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study348 cited
1997Systematic Reviews: Critical Links in the Great Chain of Evidence262 cited
2013Pinpointing needles in giant haystacks: use of text mining to reduce impractical screening workload in extremely large scoping reviews170 cited
2012A Web-based archive of systematic review data66 cited
2013Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study66 cited
2010Towards Automating the Initial Screening Phase of a Systematic Review60 cited

Cited by

2018Machine learning techniques for the automation of literature reviews and systematic reviews in EFSA

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

36 cited

2020Challenges and recommendations on the conduct of systematic reviews of observational epidemiologic studies in environmental and occupational health36 cited

2023Automating Systematic Literature Reviews with Natural Language Processing and Text Mining: A Systematic Literature Review33 cited

2024Zero‐ and few‐shot prompting of generative large language models provides weak assessment of risk of bias in clinical trials28 cited

2015Making research articles fit for purpose: structured reporting of key methods and findings28 cited

2025Digital Tools to Support the Systematic Review Process: An Introduction22 cited

2020Deep Neural Network for Reducing the Screening Workload in Systematic Reviews for Clinical Guidelines: Algorithm Validation Study22 cited

2023Automating Quality Assessment of Medical Evidence in Systematic Reviews: Model Development and Validation Study18 cited

2020Is it time for computable evidence synthesis?16 cited

2021Determining the biases and consistencies in the evidence for conservation15 cited

2023Analysis of predictive performance and reliability of classifiers for quality assessment of medical evidence revealed important variation by medical area13 cited

2021Identifying unreported links between ClinicalTrials.gov trial registrations and their published results9 cited

2023Machine Learning Methods for Systematic Reviews:: A Rapid Scoping Review.7 cited