Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The formalized framework for decision-making in child protection care orders: A cross-country analysis

16 references·16 citing·36 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1990The three worlds of welfare capitalism16,528 cited
1996Between Facts and Norms10,124 cited
1967The Model of Rules627 cited
2011Child Protection Systems532 cited
2012Reflections on Street‐Level Bureaucracy: Past, Present, and Future459 cited
2010Working together to safeguard children : a guide to inter-agency working to safeuguard and promote the welfare of children394 cited
2012Social Equities and Inequities in Practice: Street‐Level Workers as Agents and Pragmatists383 cited
1990For a Theory of Legal Argumentation262 cited
1992Solomonic Judgements: Studies in the Limitations of Rationality232 cited
2017The Model of Rules193 cited
2012Professional Discretion and Accountability in the Welfare State188 cited
2013Child protection systems within the Danish, Finnish and Norwegian welfare states—time for a child centric approach?177 cited
2020Effective Child Protection173 cited
2009Effective Child Protection126 cited
2006Practice Frameworks: Conceptual Maps to Guide Interventions in Child Welfare81 cited
2007Article 3 : the best interests of the child

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

72 cited

Cited by

2017Negotiating deficiency: Exploring ethnic minority parents' narratives about encountering child welfare services in Norway53 cited
2021The ethnic identity of transracially placed foster children with an ethnic minority background: A systematic literature review44 cited
2016The Population's Confidence in the Child Protection System – A Survey Study of England, Finland, Norway and the United States (California)40 cited
2016‘Voluntary’ and ‘involuntary’ child welfare: Challenging the distinction32 cited
2022Outcomes in adulthood among former child welfare services recipients: findings from a Norwegian registry study covering two decades26 cited
2016Parents' involvement in care order decisions: a cross‐country study of front‐line practice23 cited
2018Children in immediate danger: Emergency removals in Finnish and Irish child protection20 cited
2016Child welfare workers’ experiences of obstacles in care order preparation: a cross-country comparison19 cited
2016Deliberative Decision-Making on the Norwegian County Social Welfare Board: The Experiences of Expert and Lay Members19 cited
2018Comparing child protection decision-making in England and Finland: supervised or supported judgement?18 cited
2018Parental substance use: How child welfare workers make the case for court intervention18 cited
2018INTERVENTION STRATEGIES USED BY SOCIAL WORKERS IN EMERGENCY CHILD PROTECTION18 cited
2016Social Workers and Independent Experts in Child Protection Decision Making: Messages from an Intercountry Comparative Study16 cited
2016Pathways to permanence in England and Norway: A critical analysis of documents and data15 cited
2017Kinship care or upbringing by relatives? The need for ‘new’ understandings in research15 cited
2018International Perspectives on Child-responsive Courts14 cited