SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The New Millennium: time for a change!
9 references·0 citing·21 second hop
The New Millennium: time for a change! (2000)The New Millennium: time for a change!Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of a peer review (2013)Effect of blinding and unmask…The pathologist in the 21st century—generalist or specialist? (2000)The pathologist in the 21st c…Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)Peer Review in Health SciencesWhat Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)What Makes a Good Reviewer an…Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Effect of Blinding and Unmask…Origins of electron microscopy and viral diagnosis. (1997)Origins of electron microscop…Anonymity of reviewers (1994)Anonymity of reviewersA Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)A Difficult Balance: Editoria…Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Peer Review in 18th-Century S…Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis (2007)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 1—Eliciting Concepts for a New PRO Instrument (2011)The effect of masking manuscripts for the peer-review process of an ophthalmic journal (2009)Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy (2011)A Kuhnian Critique of Psychometric Research on Peer Review (2012)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors (2006)Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors (2007)More than meets the eye: the changing face of histopathology (2016)The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Integrity in Scientific Publishing (2010)Peer‐to‐peer Review and the Future of Scholarly Authority (2010)Open peer review: A randomised controlled trial (2000)Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? (2008)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)A COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION SEEKING PATTERNS OF RESEARCHERS IN THE PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (1993)Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1990Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism350 cited
  • 1998Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review281 cited
  • 1999Peer Review in Health Sciences268 cited
  • 1998What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?266 cited
  • 1992A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine212 cited
  • 2013Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of a peer review62 cited
  • 1994Anonymity of reviewers41 cited
  • 1997Origins of electron microscopy and viral diagnosis.21 cited
  • 2000The pathologist in the 21st century—generalist or specialist?17 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work