SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials
13 references·16 citing·47 second hop
Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials (2012)Quality of descriptions of treatments: a …Systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)Systematic review and meta-an…Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice (2010)Taking healthcare interventio…What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (2008)What is missing from descript…What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? (2008)What errors do peer reviewers…The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement (2006)The Reporting of Randomized C…Reporting Randomized, Controlled Trials of Herbal Interventions: An Elaborated CONSORT Statement (2006)Reporting Randomized, Control…Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Primary Treatment of Brain Tumors (2006)Quality of Randomized Control…Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Does the CONSORT checklist im…Evidence-based behavioral medicine: What is it and how do we achieve it? (2003)Evidence-based behavioral med…Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Effects of Editorial Peer Rev…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)Peer Review in Health SciencesThe scandal of poor medical research (1994)The scandal of poor medical r…The influence of intervention fidelity on treatment effect estimates in clinical trials of complex interventions: a metaepidemiological study (2024)The influence of intervention…Usage Metrics of Web-Based Interventions Evaluated in Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review (2020)Usage Metrics of Web-Based In…Reporting of Clinical Trial Interventions Published in Leading Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Journals (2019)Reporting of Clinical Trial I…On the Reporting of Experimental and Control Therapies in Stroke Rehabilitation Trials: A Systematic Review (2018)On the Reporting of Experimen…Investigating the Adequacy of Intervention Descriptions in Recent Speech-Language Pathology Literature: Is Evidence From Randomized Trials Useable? (2017)Investigating the Adequacy of…IMPROVING THE REPORTING OF THERAPEUTIC EXERCISE INTERVENTIONS IN REHABILITATION RESEARCH. (2017)IMPROVING THE REPORTING OF TH…Description of interventions is under-reported in physical therapy clinical trials (2017)Description of interventions …Using the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) as a tool for improving the design and reporting of manual therapy interventions (2016)Using the template for interv…Major discrepancies between what clinical trial registries record and paediatric randomised controlled trials publish (2016)Major discrepancies between w…Do we really know what they were testing? Incomplete reporting of interventions in randomised trials of upper limb therapies in unilateral cerebral palsy (2016)Do we really know what they w…What's in a name? The challenge of describing interventions in systematic reviews: analysis of a random sample of reviews of non-pharmacological stroke interventions (2015)What's in a name? The challen…‘TIDieR-ing up’ the Reporting of Interventions in Stroke Research: The Importance of Knowing What is in the ‘Black Box' (2015)‘TIDieR-ing up’ the Reporting…The completeness of intervention descriptions in published National Institute of Health Research HTA-funded trials: a cross-sectional study (2014)The completeness of intervent…Reporting of interventions in randomised trials: an audit of journal Instructions to Authors (2014)Reporting of interventions in…Quality of reporting of complex healthcare interventions and applicability of the CReDECI list - a survey of publications indexed in PubMed (2013)Quality of reporting of compl…Commissioning mental health services (1997)Commissioning mental health s…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. (2008)Fundamental Movement Skills in Children and Adolescents (2010)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: The CALO-RE taxonomy (2011)Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data) (2015)Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review (2007)The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals (2019)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria (2002)Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel (2011)Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability (2016)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Treatment integrity in psychotherapy research: Analysis of the studies and examination of the associated factors. (2007)Fundamental Movement Skill Interventions in Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2013)Gamification: What It Is and Why It Matters to Digital Health Behavior Change Developers (2013)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour (2013)Suicide and suicidal behaviour (2015)Understanding and Promoting Effective Engagement With Digital Behavior Change Interventions (2016)Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis (2007)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 1—Eliciting Concepts for a New PRO Instrument (2011)Educational Research, Policymaking and Practice (2002)The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews (2013)Guidelines for Reporting Trial Protocols and Completed Trials Modified Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Extenuating Circumstances (2021)Methods and Processes of the CONSORT Group: Example of an Extension for Trials Assessing Nonpharmacologic Treatments (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement (2010)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Systematic review and meta-analysis2,659 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials1,426 cited
  • 1994The scandal of poor medical research897 cited
  • 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
  • 2008What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?613 cited
  • 2006Reporting Randomized, Controlled Trials of Herbal Interventions: An Elaborated CONSORT Statement606 cited
  • 2003Evidence-based behavioral medicine: What is it and how do we achieve it?409 cited
  • 2002Effects of Editorial Peer Review347 cited
  • 1999Peer Review in Health Sciences268 cited
  • 2008What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?226 cited
  • 2010Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice209 cited
  • 2006The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement140 cited
  • 2006Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Primary Treatment of Brain Tumors95 cited

Cited by

  • 2018On the Reporting of Experimental and Control Therapies in Stroke Rehabilitation Trials: A Systematic Review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

59 cited
  • 2017IMPROVING THE REPORTING OF THERAPEUTIC EXERCISE INTERVENTIONS IN REHABILITATION RESEARCH.55 cited
  • 2015What's in a name? The challenge of describing interventions in systematic reviews: analysis of a random sample of reviews of non-pharmacological stroke interventions54 cited
  • 2014Reporting of interventions in randomised trials: an audit of journal Instructions to Authors53 cited
  • 2015‘TIDieR-ing up’ the Reporting of Interventions in Stroke Research: The Importance of Knowing What is in the ‘Black Box'48 cited
  • 2016Using the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) as a tool for improving the design and reporting of manual therapy interventions45 cited
  • 2017Investigating the Adequacy of Intervention Descriptions in Recent Speech-Language Pathology Literature: Is Evidence From Randomized Trials Useable?42 cited
  • 2017Description of interventions is under-reported in physical therapy clinical trials39 cited
  • 1997Commissioning mental health services38 cited
  • 2024The influence of intervention fidelity on treatment effect estimates in clinical trials of complex interventions: a metaepidemiological study36 cited
  • 2016Do we really know what they were testing? Incomplete reporting of interventions in randomised trials of upper limb therapies in unilateral cerebral palsy31 cited
  • 2014The completeness of intervention descriptions in published National Institute of Health Research HTA-funded trials: a cross-sectional study29 cited
  • 2020Usage Metrics of Web-Based Interventions Evaluated in Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review26 cited
  • 2016Major discrepancies between what clinical trial registries record and paediatric randomised controlled trials publish26 cited
  • 2019Reporting of Clinical Trial Interventions Published in Leading Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Journals22 cited
  • 2013Quality of reporting of complex healthcare interventions and applicability of the CReDECI list - a survey of publications indexed in PubMed21 cited