Social inequality in the prevalence of depressive disorders

Ingelise Andersen · Karsten Thielen · Else Nygaard · Finn Diderichsen

136 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Epidemiology & Community Health

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Health disparities and outcomes Mental Health Treatment and Access Employment and Welfare Studies

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Uncertainties exist about the strength of the relation between socioeconomic position and depressive disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between education, occupation, employment and income and depressive disorders measured as minor and major depression, as well as antidepressant prescriptions. METHODS: Data were collected from a Danish cross-sectional study collected year 2000, comprising 9254 subjects, 55% women, and aged 36-56 years. Register-based information on education, income and prescription were used. RESULTS: The prevalence of major depression DSM-IV algorithm was 3.3% among men and women, whereas minor depression and prescriptions revealed statistically significant higher prevalence among females. A social gradient was found for all depressive end-points with the strongest estimates related to major depressive disorder (MDD). The associations were as follows: MDD and low education odds ratio (OR) 2.38 (CI 95% 1.68 to 3.37), MDD and non-employment OR 11.67 (CI 95% 8.06 to 16.89), MDD and low income OR 9.78 (CI 95% 6.49 to 14.74). Education only explained a minor part of the association between non-employment and depressive disorders and no associations were found between education and prescription. This indicates a strong two-way association between depression and non-employment, low-income respectively. CONCLUSION: A social gradient in depressive disorders was found regardless of socioeconomic position being measured by education, occupation, employment or income. Severe socioeconomic consequences of depression are indicated by the fact that the associations with non-employment and low income were much stronger than the association with low education.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 136 citations exist upstream.

References

2003The Epidemiology of Major Depressive Disorder 2005Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1): Figure 1 2003Socioeconomic Inequalities in Depression: A Meta-Analysis 2004Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project 2001Gender Differences in Depression 1988THE MEASUREMENT OF SOCIAL CLASS IN EPIDEMIOLOGY 2006Prevalence and Incidence Studies of Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review of the Literature 2001The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity

Cited by

2012Major depression in the Era of economic crisis: A replication of a cross-sectional study across Greece 2014The Impact of Social Deprivation on Paranoia, Hallucinations, Mania and Depression: The Role of Discrimination Social Support, Stress and Trust 2011Socioeconomic status and risk of psychological distress and depression in the Stockholm Public Health Cohort: A population-based study 2011Increasing prevalence of depression from 2000 to 2006

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.