Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Researchers as evaluators: tasks, tensions and politics

16 references·15 citing·33 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1991The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers1,610 cited
2003Introduction: `Mode 2' Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge1,232 cited
2009How Professors Think1,084 cited
2003Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science1,003 cited
1973Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems.849 cited
1971Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system790 cited
2005Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science768 cited
2009How professors think: inside the curious world of academic judgment601 cited
1983The Hierarchy of the Sciences?485 cited
1998The Evaluative State Reconsidered.434 cited
1994Prometheus Bound318 cited
1992Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy280 cited
1985Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners258 cited
1991New Light on Old Boys: Cognitive and Institutional Particularism in the Peer Review System248 cited
1984Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners243 cited
2001Editorial peer review : its strengths and weaknesses

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

231 cited

Cited by

2012The academic researcher role: enhancing expectations and improved performance128 cited
2019Balancing accountability and trust: university reforms in the Nordic countries91 cited
2019Reforms, Organizational Change and Performance in Higher Education80 cited
2015Excellence and growth dynamics: A comparative study of the Matthew effect71 cited
2020Bibliometrics in Academic Recruitment: A Screening Tool Rather than a Game Changer66 cited
2012The Selection of Scientific Talent in the Allocation of Research Grants44 cited
2018Journal Editors: Gatekeepers or Custodians?35 cited
2019Measuring bias, burden and conservatism in research funding processes35 cited
2022Peer review in an Era of Evaluation29 cited
2017Evaluation for the allocation of university research project funding: Can rules improve the peer review?29 cited
2019European Research Council: excellence and leadership over time from a gender perspective22 cited
2024Interdisciplinary Research, Tenure Review, and Guardians of the Disciplinary Order17 cited
2016Ejes de discusión en la evaluación de la ciencia: revisión por pares, bibliometría y pertinencia15 cited
2015Innovation Suppression and Clique Evolution in Peer-Review-Based, Competitive Research Funding Systems: An Agent-Based Model14 cited
2022Peer Review in Academia11 cited