Measuring dimensions of manufacturing flexibility

Lori L. Koste · Manoj K. Malhotra · Subhash Sharma

253 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Operations Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Management and Optimization Techniques Quality and Supply Management Collaboration in agile enterprises

Abstract

Abstract Even though many managers and academics have cited flexibility as a key competitive capability, efforts to measure and understand this complex construct continue. Consequently in this paper, we address the issue of manufacturing flexibility measurement, and then use these measures to better understand flexibility. Churchill’s [J. Market. Res. 16 (1979) 64] paradigm is used to develop psychometrically sound measures for six oft‐used dimensions of manufacturing flexibility: machine, labor, material handling, mix, new product, and modification. Previous research shows that each of these dimensions, in turn, is comprised of four elements. The resulting 24 scales (6 dimensions×4 elements) demonstrate the desired properties of unidimensionality, reliability, and validity. We show further that the four elements of any given manufacturing flexibility dimension can be grouped into two conceptually separate factors representing “Scope” and “Achievability” of flexible responses. Scope and achievability factor scores can be used to compare a subset of firms with respect to their flexibility choices, and observe the trade‐offs firms make both within and across flexibility dimensions. Along with scale development, establishing scope versus achievability relationships between flexibility elements provides a better basis for measuring and creating a holistic understanding of this complex concept.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 253 citations exist upstream.

References

1981Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error 1979A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs 1991Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation 1995Testing Structural Equation Models.1984Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias.1995A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling 1995A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations 1993rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement.

Cited by

2010An examination of the relationship between manufacturing flexibility and firm performance 2012Measuring parameters of lean manufacturing realization 2014Tactical supply chain planning models with inherent flexibility: definition and review 2020Strategic alliances, exploration and exploitation and their impact on innovation and new product development: the effect of knowledge sharing 2015Knowledge acquisition and product innovation flexibility in SMEs

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.