Money-Back Guarantees: Helping the Low-Quality Retailer

Bruce P. McWilliams

200 citations0/0 files storedManagement Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing Merger and Competition Analysis Supply Chain and Inventory Management

Abstract

Existing literature, based on signaling theory, suggests that money-back guarantees (MBGs) will be utilized by high-quality firms, where high quality is defined as a low likelihood of product return. However, in today's world, MBGs are ubiquitous among major retailers, even when the likelihood of product return varies greatly between them. To understand this phenomenon, we explore a competitive environment between high- and low-quality retailers where consumers are fully informed and risk neutral, and retailers realize a salvage value for returned products. When MBGs are profitable, under continuous demand it is Nash equilibrium for both retailers to offer MBGs, and the low-quality retailer gains while the high-quality retailer loses relative to when MBGs are not offered. In contrast, if demand is lumpy, retailers can act monopolistically over their respective market segments, allowing both retailers to gain from MBGs, although the low-quality retailer still gains more. This paper was accepted by J. Miguel Villas-Boas, marketing.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 200 citations exist upstream.

References

1988Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly 1995Signaling Quality with a Money-Back Guarantee: The Role of Transaction Costs 2006Time Value of Commercial Product Returns 1995Money back guarantees in retailing: matching products to consumer tastes

Cited by

2022Online and offline retailing: What we know and directions for future research 2014Price competition and co-operation in a duopoly closed-loop supply chain 2022Pricing and sales-effort analysis of dual-channel supply chain with channel preference, cross-channel return and free riding behavior based on revenue-sharing contract 2018Pricing and quality competition in a brand-differentiated supply chain 2019Omnichannel retailers’ return policy strategies in the presence of competition 2017How much do online consumers really value free product returns? Evidence from eBay 2021Signaling Quality with Return Insurance: Theory and Empirical Evidence 2017Return Time Leniency in Online Retail: A Signaling Theory Perspective on Buying Outcomes

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.