SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
All that glisters… How to assess the ‘value’ of a scientific paper
10 references·2 citing·41 second hop
All that glisters… How to assess the ‘value’ of a scientific paper (2005)All that glisters… How to assess the ‘val…The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)The Logic of Scientific Disco…Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem (2002)Peer review of statistics in …The case report – an endangered species? (2001)The case report – an endanger…Misleading meta-analysis (1995)Misleading meta-analysisMeta-analysis: Statistical alchemy for the 21st century (1995)Meta-analysis: Statistical al…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…The miracle of DICE therapy for acute stroke: fact or fictional product of subgroup analysis? (1994)The miracle of DICE therapy f…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific R…THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC R…The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1959)The Logic of Scientific Disco…Trials and tribulations of a meta‐analyst (2015)Trials and tribulations of a …Salami slicing or living off the fat? Justifying multiple publications from a single HIV dataset (2014)Salami slicing or living off …Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool (2015)A CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers (the CHAMP statement): explanation and elaboration (2021)Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)Why do we need systematic overviews of randomized trials? (Transcript of an oral presentation, modified by the editors) (1987)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)From Science to Practice (1995)Problems of using modelling in the economic evaluation of health care (1996)Can electronic monitoring reduce crime for moderate to high-risk offenders? (2005)Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? (1996)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)10.1037/e363212004-001 (2000)Time for a new approach to case reports (2010)Open-access electronic case report journals: the rationale for case report guidelines (2013)Important of case-reports/series, in rare diseases: Using neuroendocrine tumors as an example (2014)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (1997)Multivariate meta‐analysis: Potential and promise (2011)Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2017)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment (1988)Methods for Trend Estimation from Summarized Dose-Response Data, with Applications to Meta-Analysis (1992)Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: Why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away (1997)Sex differences on the progressive matrices: A meta-analysis (2004)Cultural meaning of perceived control: A meta-analysis of locus of control and psychological symptoms across 18 cultural regions. (2012)Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria (1990)Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come (2004)Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research (2012)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Technological paradigms and technological trajectories (1982)Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies (2015)The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. (1967)Competing paradigms in qualitative research. (1994)Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research (1992)Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences (1994)Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions35,276 cited
  • 1963THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS8,424 cited
  • 2013The Logic of Scientific Discovery7,732 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 1959The Logic of Scientific Discovery2,713 cited
  • 1995Misleading meta-analysis508 cited
  • 1995Meta-analysis: Statistical alchemy for the 21st century338 cited
  • 2002Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem156 cited
  • 1994The miracle of DICE therapy for acute stroke: fact or fictional product of subgroup analysis?148 cited
  • 2001The case report – an endangered species?42 cited

Cited by

  • 2014Salami slicing or living off the fat? Justifying multiple publications from a single HIV dataset17 cited
  • 2015Trials and tribulations of a meta‐analyst14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work