Why Don’t People Think Evolution Is True? Implications for Teaching, In and Out of the Classroom

Warren Douglas Allmon

54 citations0/0 files storedEvolution Education and Outreach

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Evolution and Science Education Science Education and Pedagogy Philosophy and History of Science

Abstract

The causes of non-acceptance of evolution are groupable into five categories: inadequate understanding of the empirical evidence and the content of modern evolutionary theory, inadequate understanding of the nature of science, religion, various psychological factors, and political and social factors. This multiplicity of causes is not sufficiently appreciated by many scientists, educators, and journalists, and the widespread rejection of evolution is a much more complicated problem than many of these front-line practitioners think it is. Solutions to the widespread non-acceptance of evolution must therefore involve not just further resolution of the “religion vs. science” controversy. They must also involve better communication of empirical evidence for evolution, more effective explication of the nature of science, and explicitly addressing the numerous significant psychological obstacles that evolution presents to many (perhaps most) people. There is no clear roadmap to how to do all of this, but some practical recommendations include (1) more research on why and when different people accept or do not accept evolution when they are exposed to it, especially the role of “scientific” vs. “affective” causes for non-acceptance, and also on apparently deeply rooted psychological obstacles to acceptance. (2) A more explicit approach to explication and understanding of the causes for non-acceptance of evolution should support the often-stated goal of understanding “where students are” prior to implementing the kind of approaches frequently advocated for teaching evolution. (3) Integration of multiple educational perspectives and academic disciplines to support application of pedagogical strategies in actual educational settings. (4) Increased development and application of approaches to evolution education in settings beyond the K–16 classroom, such as museums, nature centers, zoos, parks, and aquaria.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 54 citations exist upstream.

References

2013The Logic of Scientific Discovery 2013Handbook of Research on Science Education 2004Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment 1996Development and validation of the State Hope Scale.1973Nothing in Biology Makes Sense except in the Light of Evolution 1959The Logic of Scientific Discovery.1986The Blind Watchmaker 1983The growth of biological thought. Diversity, evolution, and inheritance

Cited by

2014Scientific consensus and social controversy: exploring relationships between students’ conceptions of the nature of science, biological evolution, and global climate change 2016Insights Into the Diversity of Attitudes Concerning Evolution and Creation: A Multidimensional Approach 2018Using human case studies to teach evolution in high school A.P. biology classrooms 2018The positive effect of role models in evolution instruction 2021European first-year university students accept evolution but lack substantial knowledge about it: a standardized European cross-country assessment

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.