Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Arguments, scenarios and probabilities: connections between three normative frameworks for evidential reasoning

16 references·5 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2011Thinking, Fast and Slow14,316 cited
2003The Uses of Argument7,099 cited
2014Handbook of Argumentation Theory675 cited
2009Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence601 cited
1987Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy.407 cited
1981Reconstructing reality in the courtroom311 cited
1993Reasoning in explanation-based decision making293 cited
2005Analysis of Evidence271 cited
1994Anchored Narratives: The Psychology of Criminal Evidence248 cited
2000The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements209 cited
2007On Bayesian Measures of Evidential Support: Theoretical and Empirical Issues183 cited
2007Juridical Proof and the Best Explanation181 cited
2010A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence120 cited
2017Interpretations of Probability118 cited
2011Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence90 cited
2011Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence: A Formal Hybrid Theory

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

89 cited

Cited by

2017Proof with and without probabilities34 cited
2018Assessment criteria or standards of proof? An effort in clarification18 cited
2018Abduction, IBE and standards of proof15 cited
2018Narration in judiciary fact-finding: a probabilistic explication14 cited
2020Editors' Review and Introduction: Models of Rational Proof in Criminal Law10 cited