Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How well is the clinical importance of study results reported? An assessment of randomized controlled trials.

2 references·8 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1989Measurement of health status4,979 cited
2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials1,426 cited

Cited by

2015Interpretation of Results of Studies Evaluating an Intervention Highlighted in Google Health News: A Cross-Sectional Study of News70 cited
2002Judging the judges: the role of journal editors40 cited
2007A systematic review of the quality of publications reporting coronary artery bypass grafting trials.39 cited
2020Primary outcome reporting in adolescent depression clinical trials needs standardization33 cited
2009Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products18 cited
2002Nursing intervention studies: A descriptive analysis of issues important to clinicians17 cited
2014Cross-sectional analysis of the reporting of continuous outcome measures and clinical significance of results in randomized trials of non-pharmacological interventions12 cited
2016Misleading reporting and interpretation of results in major infertility journals9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work