SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A systematic review of analytical methods used to study subgroups in (individual patient data) meta-analyses
16 references·2 citing·41 second hop
A systematic review of analytical methods used to study subgroups in (individual patient data) meta-analyses (2007)A systematic review of analytical methods…Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice (2005)Meta-analysis of individual p…Investigating heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of time to event outcomes (2005)Investigating heterogeneity i…Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factors (2004)Meta-regression detected asso…Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Measuring inconsistency in me…To IPD or not to IPD? (2002)To IPD or not to IPD?Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context. (2002)Systematic Reviews in Health …Individual patient‐ versus group‐level data meta‐regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head (2002)Individual patient‐ versus gr…Epidemiology: An Introduction (2002)Epidemiology: An IntroductionDevelopment of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Development of a highly sensi…A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis (2002)A comparison of summary patie…Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis (2001)Statistical Methods for Exami…Meta‐analysis of continuous outcome data from individual patients (2001)Meta‐analysis of continuous o…Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health …A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes (2000)A multilevel model framework …An evidence based approach to individualising treatment (1995)An evidence based approach to…Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? (1993)Meta-analysis of the literatu…A systematic survey identified 36 criteria for assessing effect modification claims in randomized trials or meta-analyses (2019)A systematic survey identifie…Distribution and Epidemiological Characteristics of Published Individual Patient Data Meta-Analyses (2014)Distribution and Epidemiologi…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints (1998)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Suicide as an outcome for mental disorders (1997)Excess mortality of mental disorder (1998)How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies (2015)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Multiple Treatment Comparisons: An Introduction to Mixed Treatment Comparisons (2008)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3 (2013)Methods for Population-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Health Technology Appraisal (2017)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Narrowing the transmission gap: A synthesis of three decades of research on intergenerational transmission of attachment. (2015)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (2006)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Formative Assessment Using Cbm-R Cut Scores To Track Progress Toward Success On State-Mandated Achievement Tests: a Comparison of Methods (2005)The prevalence of child maltreatment in the Netherlands across a 5-year period (2013)The Prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse in Out-of-Home Care (2013)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Qstatistics (2011)Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ (2016)El Cuestionario de Salud SF-36 español: una década de experiencia y nuevos desarrollos (2005)Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta‐analytical methods with rare events (2006)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
  • 2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
  • 2001Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis2,163 cited
  • 2002Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context.1,363 cited
  • 2002Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed833 cited
  • 1993Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference?769 cited
  • 2002Epidemiology: An Introduction765 cited
  • 2002To IPD or not to IPD?571 cited
  • 2005Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice557 cited
  • 2002Individual patient‐ versus group‐level data meta‐regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head469 cited
  • 2002A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis394 cited
  • 1995An evidence based approach to individualising treatment389 cited
  • 2001Meta‐analysis of continuous outcome data from individual patients265 cited
  • 2000A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

265 cited
  • 2004Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factors245 cited
  • 2005Investigating heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of time to event outcomes173 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019A systematic survey identified 36 criteria for assessing effect modification claims in randomized trials or meta-analyses24 cited
    • 2014Distribution and Epidemiological Characteristics of Published Individual Patient Data Meta-Analyses16 cited