SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Value and limitation of meta-analysis
15 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Value and limitation of meta-analysis (2002)Value and limitation of meta-analysisUses and abuses of meta-analysis (2001)Uses and abuses of meta-analy…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing (1999)How can medical journals help…Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (1998)Overcoming the limitations of…Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials (1998)Effect of the Statistical Sig…How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. (1997)How important is publication …Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Discrepancies between Meta-An…Predictive ability of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (1995)Predictive ability of meta-an…Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Full publication of results i…The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care (1993)The Cochrane Collaboration: P…Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of T…Meta‐Analysis: Whither Narrative Review? (1989)Meta‐Analysis: Whither Narrat…Considerations for the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (1989)Considerations for the meta-a…The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)The Medical Review Article: S…Meta‐analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. I: Control of bias and comparison with large co‐operative trials (1987)Meta‐analysis of clinical tri…A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques (1997)A Brief History of Research Synthesis (2002)To IPD or not to IPD? (2002)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools (2004)The Number of Patients and Events Required to Limit the Risk of Overestimation of Intervention Effects in Meta-Analysis—A Simulation Study (2011)A meta-analysis and model of the relationship between sleep and depression in adolescents: Recommendations for future research and clinical practice (2014)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Registering Clinical Trials (2003)Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: Meta-analysis (2015)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Collaborative Care for Depression (2006)Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? (2015)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Bilateral hippocampal volume reduction in adults with post-traumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis of structural MRI studies (2005)The association between suicide and the socio-economic characteristics of geographical areas: a systematic review (2005)Prevalence of Transgender Depends on the “Case” Definition: A Systematic Review (2016)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Positive Psychological Well-Being and Mortality: A Quantitative Review of Prospective Observational Studies (2008)Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses (2008)A Review of Transformational School Leadership Research 1996–2005 (2005)Review: Immigrants and Health Care Access, Quality, and Cost (2009)About and beyond leading uniqueness and belongingness: A systematic review of inclusive leadership research (2022)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
  • 1992Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction1,138 cited
  • 1987The Medical Review Article: State of the Science857 cited
  • 1998Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials631 cited
  • 1993The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care562 cited
  • 1998Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials428 cited
  • 1994Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis403 cited
  • 1997How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data.311 cited
  • 2001Uses and abuses of meta-analysis258 cited
  • 1987Meta‐analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. I: Control of bias and comparison with large co‐operative trials246 cited
  • 1995Predictive ability of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials225 cited
  • 1989Considerations for the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials119 cited
  • 1999How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

114 cited
  • 1989Meta‐Analysis: Whither Narrative Review?53 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.