Social Boundaries and Marital Assimilation: Interpreting Trends in Racial and Ethnic Intermarriage

Zhenchao Qian · Daniel T. Lichter

617 citations0/0 files storedAmerican Sociological Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Racial and Ethnic Identity Research Migration, Refugees, and Integration Family Dynamics and Relationships

Abstract

Interracial/interethnic marriage in America is a barometer of racial/ethnic relations and intergroup social distance. Using data from the 5-percent Public Use Microdata Sample of the 1990 and 2000 censuses, we interpret trends in intermarriage in light of new assimilation theory, recent changes in racial classification, and rapid demographic changes in American society. Our results indicate that changes in marital assimilation have taken on momentum of their own; that is, America's growing biracial population has fueled the growth of interracial marriages with whites. Analyses also shed new light on the effects of rapid immigration, rising cohabitation, and educational upgrading on intermarriage patterns, and yield both continuities and departures from the past. Historic patterns of racial/ethnic differences in intermarriage persist—Hispanics and American Indians are most likely to marry whites, followed closely by Asian Americans. African Americans are least likely to marry whites. Yet, the 1990s brought significant increases in intermarriage between blacks and whites; large increases in cohabitation did not offset the growth of racially-mixed marriages. The past decade also ushered in unprecedented declines in intermarriage with whites and large increases in marriage between native- and foreign-born co-ethnics among Hispanics and Asian Americans. The role of educational attainment in the out-marriage patterns of Hispanics and Asian Americans was also reinforced. Any evidence of differential growth in African American-white marriages among the highly educated African American population was weak. If intermarriage is our guide, any shifting, blurring, or crossing of racial/ethnic boundaries represent uncommonly weak mechanisms for breaking down existing racial barriers to black-white union formation.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 617 citations exist upstream.

References

1994Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s 2002The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences 1977Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure 1964Assimilation in American Life.1922Introduction to the Science of Sociology 2004Remaking the American mainstream: assimilation and contemporary immigration 2015Remaking the American Mainstream 1998Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends

Cited by

2010Critical Race Theories, Colorism, and the Decade's Research on Families of Color 2014Social Distance in the United States 2009The Changing Racial and Ethnic Composition of the US Population: Emerging American Identities 2010Connecting Complex Processes: A Decade of Research on Immigrant Families 2010Latino Immigrants and the U.S. Racial Order 2007Does Money Whiten? Intergenerational Changes in Racial Classification in Brazil

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.