Sample size requirements for the internal validation of psychiatric scales

Alexandra Rouquette · Bruno Falissard

297 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Statistical Methods in Epidemiology Health Education and Validation

Abstract

The ratio of subjects to variables (N/p), as a rule to calculate the sample size required in internal validity studies on measurement scales, has been recommended without any strict theoretical or empirical basis being provided. The purpose of the present study was to develop a tool to determine sample size for these studies in the field of psychiatry. First, a literature review was carried out to identify the distinctive features of psychiatric scales. Then, two simulation methods were developed to generate data according to: (1) the model for factor structure derived from the literature review and (2) a real dataset. This enabled the study of the quality of solutions obtained from principal component analysis or Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) on various sample sizes. Lastly, the influence of sample size on the precision of Cronbach's alpha coefficient was examined. The N/p ratio rule is not upheld by this study: short scales do not allow smaller sample size. As a rule of thumb, if one's aim is to reveal the factor structure, a minimum of 300 subjects is generally acceptable but should be increased when the number of factors within the scale is large, when EFA is used and when the number of items is small.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 297 citations exist upstream.

References

1961An Inventory for Measuring Depression 1960A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION 2007Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research 2020Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis 1999Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.1999Sample size in factor analysis.2013A First Course in Factor Analysis 1995Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.

Cited by

2024Can Harman’s single-factor test reliably distinguish between research designs? Not in published management studies 2023A systematic literature review of exploratory factor analyses in management 2022A review of exploratory factor analysis in tourism and hospitality research: Identifying current practices and avenues for improvement 2020The Family Health Scale: Reliability and Validity of a Short- and Long-Form 2021Developing and Validating Clinical Questionnaires

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.