Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Survival End Point Reporting in Randomized Cancer Clinical Trials: A Review of Major Journals

7 references·9 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
1982Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials509 cited
2005Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors178 cited
2005Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals176 cited

Cited by

2011Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Treatment of Sarcomas50 cited
2016Review of the Reporting of Survival Analyses within Randomised Controlled Trials and the Implications for Meta-Analysis43 cited
2014Importance of Transparent Reporting of Health Research43 cited
2011Reporting of loss to follow-up information in randomised controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes: a literature survey29 cited
2017Reporting and methodological quality of survival analysis in articles published in Chinese oncology journals27 cited
2020A guide on meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes using aggregate data in vascular and endovascular surgery

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

26 cited

2022Methodology to standardize heterogeneous statistical data presentations for combining time-to-event oncologic outcomes20 cited

2015Recommendations for reporting histopathology studies: a proposal13 cited

2020GRADE Guidelines: 29. Rating the certainty in time-to-event outcomes—Study limitations due to censoring of participants with missing data in intervention studies12 cited