Closing Down the Conversation: The End of the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate Among Educational Inquirers

Abstract

The contention of this paper is that the claim of compatibility and the call for cooperation between quantitative and qualitative inquiry cannot be sustained. Moreover, these claims have the unfortunate effect of closing down an important conversation. To elaborate these points, this paper briefly reviews the transition from conflict to cooperation between the two perspectives and then notes how compatibility is based on a confusion over two different definitions of method. Finally, the discussion focuses on why this conversation, because it invokes issues crucial to our understanding of who we are and what we do as inquirers, must be reinvigorated.

Cite this

John K. Smith, Lous Heshusius (1986). Closing Down the Conversation: The End of the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate Among Educational Inquirers. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.2307/1174482

@article{k1986closing,
  title  = {Closing Down the Conversation: The End of the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate Among Educational Inquirers},
  author = {Smith, John K. and Heshusius, Lous},
  year   = {1986},
  journal = {Educational Researcher},
  doi    = {10.2307/1174482}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 674 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by