Article1974

The Peabody Individual Achievement Test as a Clinical Tool

14 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Learning Disabilities

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology Psychological Testing and Assessment Educational and Psychological Assessments

Abstract

Eighty-three children and adolescents referred because of learning difficulties were tested using the Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT) and one or more standard measures of intelligence as part of a larger array of evaluations. Moderate positive correlations were found between the PIAT and the three measures of intelligence employed. These correlations increased significantly when statistical adjustments were made for age differences. Reliability coefficients and standard errors of measurement were calculated for all PIAT subtests. Clinical aspects of the PIAT are discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 14 citations exist upstream.

References

1949Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children; manual.1972Concurrent Validity of the Peabody Individual Achievement Test

Cited by

2005Classroom goal structures and hopelessness as predictors of day-to-day experience at school: Differences between students with and without learning disabilities 2007Reading Instruction for Struggling Learners 1986Learning Disability Discrepancy Formulas: Similarities and Differences among Them 1986Perspective 1978The Peabody Individual Achievement Test with Normal and Special School Populations 2005Discrepancy models and the meaning of learning disability 1984Comparing the PIAT and Untimed CTBS in Obtaining Achievement Scores from Disturbed Children.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.