Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Prevention of false positive findings in observational studies: registration will not work but replication might

10 references·1 citing·39 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies22,003 cited
2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies17,960 cited
2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,571 cited
2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,755 cited
2005Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: The Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials326 cited
2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies248 cited
1969Methodology168 cited
2009Ten steps towards improving prognosis research161 cited
2007Clinical Trial Registration135 cited
1971Methodology: Foundations of Inference and Research in the Behavioral Sciences.47 cited

Cited by

2025Scoping review of registration of observational studies finds inadequate registration policies, increased registration, and a debate converging toward proregistration6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work