No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Since the mid-1980s Chinese calligraphy art has undergone a radical change and has opened itself to experimentation. \nA vivid debate on "Contemporary Chinese Calligraphy" (Zhongguo xiandai shufa) is involving art critics in \nChina nowadays. Wang Dongling and the modernists think that, despite many changes and influences, we can still \nrefer to the traditional calligraphic lexicon to describe the calligraphic production of contemporary Chinese art. They \nstill remain deeply rooted in the signified system of Chinese writing, even if they break with the strict rules of \nChinese classical aesthetic (contamination of Western elements and focus on the stylistic exploration). Wang \nNanming and the Avant-garde think that “contemporary calligraphy is not calligraphy yet”: It is “anti-calligraphy”, \nannihilates Chinese tradition, rejects the use of legible characters, experiments with new languages and new media \nwithin the idiom of international contemporary art. The result is the creation of works of art that could be assimilated \nto Abstract art, Abstract expressionism, Conceptual art, Performance art, Contemporary dance, Multimedia art, and \neven Street art. This paper aims at showing how still valid and extremely productive are both these two theoretical \nand creative/practical approaches to Chinese calligraphy in China nowadays. They turned the art of calligraphy into a \nmedium for global comprehension and communication.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.