Facilitating tacit knowledge transfer: routine compatibility, trustworthiness, and integration in M & As

Rebecca Ranucci · David Souder

78 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Knowledge Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Innovation and Knowledge Management Corporate Finance and Governance Knowledge Management and Sharing

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to theorize how tacit knowledge influences implementation success in mergers and acquisitions (M & As), and contrasts this with explicit knowledge. Tacit knowledge can be a source of sustained competitive advantage because its lack of codifiability precludes easy appropriation by competitors. However, such non-codifiability also makes it difficult to transfer knowledge within a firm. M & As exemplify this challenge because they are often motivated by opportunities for transferring knowledge. With differing demands for tacit and explicit knowledge across departments (Sales and Operations), the empirical results demonstrate how tacit routine compatibility affects implementation outcomes in different functions. Design/methodology/approach – This research draws from a survey of 86 M & A implementation processes between 1996 and 2002, using seemingly unrelated regression to analyze the predictions. Findings – There is strong empirical support that tacit routine compatibility leads to success in sales but not operations and further support for the differential moderating roles of trustworthiness and integration. Practical implications – Managers should make implementation choices based on the type of knowledge being transferred and where that knowledge will reside post-integration. Routine compatibility, trustworthiness and integration facilitate knowledge transfer in M & As – but only if applied in the right combinations for the context. Originality/value – The type of knowledge is a critical distinction for the value of M & A implementation. Furthermore, despite integration receiving significant attention in this literature, trustworthiness, not integration, facilitates successful tacit knowledge transfer in M & As.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 78 citations exist upstream.

References

1991Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage 2004Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage 1997Dynamic capabilities and strategic management 1983An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.1986Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects 1997The Knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation 1997The Tacit Dimension 1998The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage

Cited by

2017Organizational unlearning and knowledge transfer in cross-border M&A: the roles of routine and knowledge compatibility 2020Organizational unlearning and knowledge transfer in cross-border M&As: the mediating role of knowledge integration from a routine-based view 2017Integrating supplier knowledge in new product development projects: decoupled and coupled approaches 2021Responsible innovation in organisations – unpacking the effects of leader trustworthiness and organizational culture on employee creativity 2019Millennials and political savvy – the mediating role of political skill linking core self-evaluation, emotional intelligence and knowledge sharing behaviour

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.