Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine

7 references·3 citing·26 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
1999Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.368 cited
2005Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals176 cited

Cited by

2013A Quality Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials about Erectile Dysfunction12 cited
2011Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Korean Journal of Urology Over the Past 20 Years12 cited
2016Quality analysis of randomized controlled trials in the International Journal of Impotence Research: quality assessment and relevant clinical impact12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work