Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The cognitive underpinnings of bias in forensic mental health evaluations.

16 references·16 citing·31 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1988Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk32,475 cited
1975Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases22,647 cited
2017A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance18,122 cited
1981The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice17,834 cited
2014Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.15,103 cited
2011Thinking, Fast and Slow14,316 cited
1973Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability9,980 cited
1990The case for motivated reasoning.9,014 cited
2013The Logic of Scientific Discovery7,732 cited
1998Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises7,230 cited
1956Rational choice and the structure of the environment.5,918 cited
1984Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.5,656 cited
1972Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness4,876 cited
1983Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.3,990 cited
1996Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.3,503 cited
1971Belief in the law of small numbers.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

3,244 cited

Cited by

2016Forensic risk assessment and cultural diversity: Contemporary challenges and future directions.166 cited
2016Forensic psychologists’ perceptions of bias and potential correction strategies in forensic mental health evaluations.114 cited
2022A general model of cognitive bias in human judgment and systematic review specific to forensic mental health.99 cited
2017Understanding and Mitigating Bias in Forensic Evaluation: Lessons from Forensic Science94 cited
2015Adversarial Allegiance among Expert Witnesses86 cited
2019How Do Legal Experts Cope With Medical Reports and Forensic Evidence? The Experiences, Perceptions, and Narratives of Swiss Judges and Other Legal Experts27 cited
2019Forensic clinicians’ understanding of bias.23 cited
2016Are Forensic Experts Already Biased before Adversarial Legal Parties Hire Them?22 cited
2020Assessing the Risk and Treatment Needs of People Who Perpetrate Intimate Partner Violence17 cited
2018The Cognitive and Social Psychological Bases of Bias in Forensic Mental Health Judgments13 cited
2016A Validation Study of the Need for Affect Questionnaire–Short Form in Legal Contexts13 cited
2024Forensic Neuropsychology Goes from Nowhere to Almost Everywhere: Lessons Learned During Decades of Practice6 cited
2023Identifying and managing evaluator biases in parenting plan evaluations4 cited
2025Psychological insights for judging expertise and implications for adversarial legal contexts4 cited
2019Forensic Confirmation Bias: Is Consider-the-Opposite an Effective Debiasing Strategy?3 cited
2024Prácticas de evaluación psicológica en ámbitos jurídicos: Una encuesta a profesionales de Latinoamérica2 cited