SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Avaliação da qualidade de estudos clínicos e seu impacto nas metanálises
16 references·0 citing·35 second hop
Avaliação da qualidade de estudos clínicos e seu impacto nas metanálises (2005)Avaliação da qualidade de estudos clínico…Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (2002)Correlation of Quality Measur…The need for caution in interpreting high quality systematic reviews (2001)The need for caution in inter…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)Reported Methodologic Quality…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…Measuring the Quality of Trials (1999)Measuring the Quality of Tria…The Delphi List (1998)The Delphi ListImproving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1998)Improving the quality of repo…Can quality of clinical trials and meta-analyses be quantified? (1998)Can quality of clinical trial…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Systematic Reviews: Reporting, updating, and correcting systematic reviews of the effects of health care (1994)Systematic Reviews: Reporting…Two cheers for meta-analysis: problems and opportunities in aggregating results of clinical trials. (1988)Two cheers for meta-analysis:…The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)The Medical Review Article: S…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. (2008)Fundamental Movement Skills in Children and Adolescents (2010)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment (2004)A Systematic Review of School-Based Interventions to Prevent Bullying (2007)Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials (2007)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 1998The Delphi List2,379 cited
  • 2001Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses2,285 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials1,426 cited
  • 1987The Medical Review Article: State of the Science857 cited
  • 2002Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials473 cited
  • 1998Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement177 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Reporting, updating, and correcting systematic reviews of the effects of health care169 cited
  • 1999Measuring the Quality of Trials102 cited
  • 2001The need for caution in interpreting high quality systematic reviews84 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1998Can quality of clinical trials and meta-analyses be quantified?75 cited
  • 1988Two cheers for meta-analysis: problems and opportunities in aggregating results of clinical trials.54 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.