The Relation between Students’ Epistemological Understanding of Computer Models and their Cognitive Processing on a Modelling Task

Patrick H. M. Sins · Elwin R. Savelsbergh · Wouter van Joolingen · B.H.A.M. van Hout‐Wolters

94 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Science Education

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Science Education and Pedagogy Educational Strategies and Epistemologies Science Education and Perceptions

Abstract

While many researchers in science education have argued that students’ epistemological understanding of models and of modelling processes would influence their cognitive processing on a modelling task, there has been little direct evidence for such an effect. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relation between students’ epistemological understanding of models and modelling and their cognitive processing (i.e., deep versus surface processing) on a modelling task. Twenty‐six students, working in dyads, were observed while working on a computer‐based modelling task in the domain of physics. Students’ epistemological understanding was assessed on four dimensions (i.e., nature of models, purposes of models, process of modelling, and evaluation of models). Students’ cognitive processes were assessed based on their verbal protocols, using a coding scheme to classify their types of reasoning. The outcomes confirmed the expected positive correlation between students’ level of epistemological understanding and their deep processing (r = 0.40, p = .04), and the negative correlation between level of epistemological understanding and surface processing (r = −0.51, p = .008). From these results, we emphasise the necessity of considering epistemological understanding in research as well as in educational practice.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 94 citations exist upstream.

References

1973Review of research in education 2003Learning to Teach in Higher Education 1976ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS*1997The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning 2002Learning to Teach in Higher Education 1990Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension.1992Learning to Teach in Higher Education 1992Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research

Cited by

2011In Quest of productive modeling‐based learning discourse in elementary school science 2014Analyzing Students’ Understanding of Models and Modeling Referring to the Disciplines Biology, Chemistry, and Physics 2014Assessing Students' Understandings of Biological Models and their Use in Science to Evaluate a Theoretical Framework 2019Modeling competence in science education 2013Students’ Levels of Understanding Models and Modelling in Biology: Global or Aspect-Dependent?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.