SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Scientometric indicators: peer-review, bibliometric methods and conflict of interests · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleScientometric indicators: peer-review, bibliometric methods and conflict of interests

Primož Južnič2010

Article2010

Scientometric indicators: peer-review, bibliometric methods and conflict of interests

Primož Južnič · Stojan Pečlin · Matjaž Žaucer · Tilen Mandelj · Miro Pušnik · Franci Demšar

50 citations·0/0 files stored·Scientometrics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Research, Science, and Academia Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 50 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research 1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review 2006Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups 2005Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?2002Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts 1996Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises 2003The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence 1998Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria

Cited by

2016Mapping and classification of agriculture in Web of Science: other subject categories and research fields may benefit 2013A concept for inferring ‘frontier research’ in grant proposals 2013Social change, institutional pressures and knowledge creation: A bibliometric analysis 2012Effects of international collaboration and status of journal on impact of papers

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2015Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Managementother · 14 shared references 2008Challenges for scientometric indicators: data demining, knowledge-flow measurements and diversity issuesarticle · 7 shared references 2015The VQR , I taly's second national research assessment: Methodological failures and ranking distortionsarticle · 7 shared references 2010A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impactarticle · 6 shared references 2005Citations and their use as indicators in science policy : studies of validity and applicability issues with a particular focus on highly cited papersthesis · 6 shared references 2014Does massive funding support of researchers work?: Evaluating the impact of the South African research chair funding initiativearticle · 5 shared references

Details

Year2010

Typearticle

Published2010-04-30

VenueScientometrics

ISSN-L0138-9130

Languageen

Citations50

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s11192-010-0230-8

openalex_workW2135961839

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2018

Tech mining to validate and refine a technology roadmap

2012A quantitative study on the effectiveness of peer review for academic journals

2019When Public Discourse Mirrors Academic Debate: Research Integrity in the Media

2013Transparency of research policy and the role of librarians