SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Scale of Methodological Quality for Clinical Studies of Radiologic Examinations
16 references·5 citing·38 second hop
A Scale of Methodological Quality for Clinical Studies of Radiologic Examinations (2000)A Scale of Methodological Quality for Cli…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders (1997)Method Guidelines for Systema…Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Discrepancies between Meta-An…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good (1995)Use of methodological standar…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasAssessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Rationale…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifyi…Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests (1994)Guidelines for Meta-analyses …Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Validation of an index of the…The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)The Medical Review Article: S…Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Res…Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analyses of Randomized C…A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)A method for assessing the qu…Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Intraclass correlations: Uses…A unified framework for bias assessment in clinical research (2019)A unified framework for bias …Escalas y listas de evaluación de la calidad de estudios científicos (2013)Escalas y listas de evaluació…An assessment of inter-rater agreement of the literature filtering process in the development of evidence-based dietary guidelines (2006)An assessment of inter-rater …MR imaging of the articular cartilage of the knee with arthroscopy as gold standard: assessment of methodological quality of clinical studies (2002)MR imaging of the articular c…Systematic review in diagnostic radiology (2001)Systematic review in diagnost…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research (1987)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management (2006)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. (1992)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)THE FILE-DRAWER PROBLEM REVISITED: A GENERAL WEIGHTED METHOD FOR CALCULATING FAIL-SAFE NUMBERS IN META-ANALYSIS (2005)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (1969)The job demands-resources model of burnout. (2001)A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research (2016)Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables. (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1979Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.23,882 cited
  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews1,677 cited
  • 1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 1987Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research1,267 cited
  • 1987Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials1,253 cited
  • 1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
  • 1987The Medical Review Article: State of the Science857 cited
  • 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
  • 1994Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests754 cited
  • 1997Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

735 cited
  • 1995Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good711 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019A unified framework for bias assessment in clinical research41 cited
    • 2013Escalas y listas de evaluación de la calidad de estudios científicos40 cited
    • 2001Systematic review in diagnostic radiology18 cited
    • 2002MR imaging of the articular cartilage of the knee with arthroscopy as gold standard: assessment of methodological quality of clinical studies14 cited
    • 2006An assessment of inter-rater agreement of the literature filtering process in the development of evidence-based dietary guidelines10 cited