Capital Structure and Corporate Control: The Effect of Antitakeover Statutes on Firm Leverage

Abstract

We find that firms protected by “second generation” state antitakeover laws substantially reduce their use of debt, and that unprotected firms do the reverse. This result supports recent models in which the threat of hostile takeover motivates managers to take on debt they would otherwise avoid. An implication is that legal barriers to takeovers may increase corporate slack.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 425 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.