The effect of three different educational approaches on children's drawing ability: Steiner, Montessori and traditional

Maureen V. Cox

47 citations0/0 files storedBritish Journal of Educational Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Art Education and Development Creativity in Education and Neuroscience Education Methods and Practices

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although there is a national curriculum for art education in the UK there are also alternative approaches in the private sector. This paper addresses the issue of the effect of these approaches on children's drawing ability. AIM: To compare the drawing ability in three drawing tasks of children in Steiner, Montessori and traditional schools. SAMPLE: The participants were 60 school children between the ages of 5;11 and 7;2. Twenty children were tested in each type of school. METHOD: Each child completed three drawings: a free drawing, a scene and an observational drawing. RESULTS: As predicted, the free and scene drawings of children in the Steiner school were rated more highly than those of children in Montessori and traditional schools. Steiner children's use of colour was also rated more highly, although they did not use more colours than the other children. Steiner children used significantly more fantasy topics in their free drawings. Further observation indicated that the Steiner children were better at using the whole page and organising their drawings into a scene; their drawings were also more detailed. Contrary to previous research Montessori children did not draw more inanimate objects and geometrical shapes or fewer people than other children. Also, contrary to the prediction, Steiner children were significantly better rather than worse than other children at observational drawing. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the approach to art education in Steiner schools is conducive not only to more highly rated imaginative drawings in terms of general drawing ability and use of colour but also to more accurate and detailed observational drawings.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 47 citations exist upstream.

References

1958The Child's Conception of Space 1983Creative and Mental Growth 1927Le dessin enfantin 1985Strategies of Representation in Young Children 1977Children's Drawing 1977How Children Learn to Draw Realistic Pictures 1988How We Understand Art

Cited by

2012Preschool children's development in classic Montessori, supplemented Montessori, and conventional programs 2007High School Outcomes for Students in a Public Montessori Program 2011The Color of Children’s Gender Stereotypes 2014Montessori public school pre-K programs and the school readiness of low-income Black and Latino children.2015Influence of school environment on adolescents' creative potential, motivation and well-being 2005Steiner Schools in England 2011An investigation of the expressive and representational drawing development in National Curriculum, Steiner, and Montessori schools.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.