SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Journals Should Publish All “Null” Results and Should Sparingly Publish “Positive” Results
4 references·11 citing·35 second hop
Journals Should Publish All “Null” Results and Should Sparingly Publish “Positive” Results (2006)Journals Should Publish All “Null” Result…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Local Literature Bias in Genetic Epidemiology: An Empirical Evaluation of the Chinese Literature (2005)Local Literature Bias in Gene…Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough (1998)Summing up evidence: one answ…To Be Scientific Is To Be Communist (2023)To Be Scientific Is To Be Com…The case for openness in engineering research (2018)The case for openness in engi…Simple changes of individual studies can improve the reproducibility of the biomedical scientific process as a whole (2018)Simple changes of individual …Conditional equivalence testing: An alternative remedy for publication bias (2018)Conditional equivalence testi…The publication symmetry test: a simple editorial heuristic to combat publication bias (2017)The publication symmetry test…Reproducibility in Science (2014)Reproducibility in ScienceKnowledge Integration in Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Prospects (2012)Knowledge Integration in Canc…Excess Significance Bias in the Literature on Brain Volume Abnormalities (2011)Excess Significance Bias in t…Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science (2008)Why Current Publication Pract…Molecular evidence‐based medicine (2007)Molecular evidence‐based medi…Methods for meta-analysis in genetic association studies: a review of their potential and pitfalls (2007)Methods for meta-analysis in …Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Systematic Reviews of Genetic Association Studies (2009)Flexible Working and Performance: A Systematic Review of the Evidence for a Business Case (2011)Systematic meta-analyses and field synopsis of genetic association studies of violence and aggression (2013)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. (2003)The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes (2010)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Scientific Utopia (2012)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)What does research reproducibility mean? (2016)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Redefine statistical significance (2017)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention (2014)The Neuroscience of Socioeconomic Status: Correlates, Causes, and Consequences (2017)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The Retail Food Environment, Store Foods, and Diet and Health among Indigenous Populations: a Scoping Review (2020)Replication of null results: Absence of evidence or evidence of absence? (2024)Improving statistical reporting in psychology (2025)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,571 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,755 cited
  • 1998Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough655 cited
  • 2005Local Literature Bias in Genetic Epidemiology: An Empirical Evaluation of the Chinese Literature170 cited

Cited by

  • 2014Reproducibility in Science1,092 cited
  • 2008Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science531 cited
  • 2011Excess Significance Bias in the Literature on Brain Volume Abnormalities303 cited
  • 2007Methods for meta-analysis in genetic association studies: a review of their potential and pitfalls211 cited
  • 2018Conditional equivalence testing: An alternative remedy for publication bias39 cited
  • 2018Simple changes of individual studies can improve the reproducibility of the biomedical scientific process as a whole21 cited
  • 2007Molecular evidence‐based medicine21 cited
  • 2023To Be Scientific Is To Be Communist19 cited
  • 2012Knowledge Integration in Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Prospects18 cited
  • 2017The publication symmetry test: a simple editorial heuristic to combat publication bias8 cited
  • 2018The case for openness in engineering research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

4 cited