Marxist Class Categories and Income Inequality

Abstract

Marxian class categories have been almost totally ignored in systematic quantitative studies of social stratification and income inequality.Occupational status or a similar variable is almost always used as the core criterion defining the individual's position in the system of stratification.This study provides a preliminary operationalization of the Marxian class categories for use in quantitative research.The three most important of these classes-workers, managers and employers-then are analyzed to see what interactions occur between class position and the usual variables used in predicting income (education, occupational status, age and job tenure) and between class and race-sex categories.It was found that there is a substanial interaction between class position and the income returns to education; within class categories, however, there are no differences between race and sex groups in the returns to education.In the study of social stratification, there is a major disjuncture between theoretical traditions and quantitative empirical work.Of all the theoretical traditions in sociology, social inequality probably plays the most central role in the Marxist perspective.Yet, quantitative investigations of the

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 409 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.