Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How Well Are Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in the Dermatology Literature?

7 references·16 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1998The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials769 cited
1994Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals512 cited
1982Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials509 cited
1996The Importance of Quality of Primary Studies in Producing Unbiased Systematic Reviews328 cited
1986A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer.195 cited

Cited by

2008Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 2: Randomized Controlled Trials123 cited
2002Discrepancy between published report and actual conduct of randomized clinical trials111 cited
2005Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review95 cited
2010An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals94 cited
2005A Review of the True Methodological Quality of Nutritional Support Trials Conducted in the Critically Ill: Time for Improvement79 cited
2009CONSORT adoption and quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: a systematic analysis in two dermatology journals

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

77 cited

2005An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently76 cited

2021The statistical approach in trial-based economic evaluations matters: get your statistics together!71 cited

2010The Reporting of Observational Research Studies in Dermatology Journals60 cited

2003Appraising Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses53 cited

2006Quality of Reporting of Randomized, Controlled Trials in Cerebral Palsy52 cited

2004Has CONSORT improved the reporting of randomized controlled trials in the palliative care literature? A systematic review51 cited

2002Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in the intensive care literature48 cited

2010Are criminologists describing randomized controlled trials in ways that allow us to assess them? Findings from a sample of crime and justice trials45 cited

2008Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery: A 20-Year Review of Reporting Standards, Methodologic Quality, and Impact43 cited

2002Secular changes in the quality of published randomized clinical trials in rheumatology41 cited