SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Appraisal of scientific evidence in criminal justice systems: on winds of change and coexisting formats
16 references·1 citing·25 second hop
Appraisal of scientific evidence in criminal justice systems: on winds of change and coexisting formats (2014)Appraisal of scientific evidence in crimi…A Framework for Interpreting Evidence (2018)A Framework for Interpreting …The psychology of interpreting expert evaluative opinions (2013)The psychology of interpretin…The Bayesian approach to forensic evidence: Evaluating, communicating, and distributing responsibility (2013)The Bayesian approach to fore…Handbook of Forensic Science (2013)Handbook of Forensic ScienceReservations about likelihood ratios (and some other aspects of forensic 'Bayesianism') (2012)Reservations about likelihood…Scale of conclusions for the value of evidence (2011)Scale of conclusions for the …Expressing evaluative opinions: A position statement (2011)Expressing evaluative opinion…Understanding of forensic expert reports by judges, defense lawyers and forensic professionals (2010)Understanding of forensic exp…Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion Association of Forensic Science Providers (2010)Standards for the formulation…Fundamentals of probability and statistical evidence in criminal proceedings: guidance for judges, lawyers, forensic scientists and expert witnesses (2010)Fundamentals of probability a…Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion (2009)Standards for the formulation…More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions (2000)More on the hierarchy of prop…A model for case assessment and interpretation (1998)A model for case assessment a…A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework (1998)A hierarchy of propositions: …Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (1996)Statistics and the Evaluation…Applications of Probability Theory in Criminalistics, II (1965)Applications of Probability T…Lead isotope ratios for bullets, forensic evaluation in a Bayesian paradigm (2015)Lead isotope ratios for bulle…Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom (1995)The nature of forensic science opinion—a possible framework to guide thinking and practicce in investigation and in court proceedings (2006)What role should investigative facts play in the evaluation of scientific evidence? (2011)The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. (1995)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (2004)Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)The communication of forensic science in the criminal justice system: A review of theory and proposed directions for research (2014)Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices (2019)Context effect and confirmation bias in criminal fact finding (2020)The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements (2000)The likelihood ratio as value of evidence--more than a question of numbers (2012)What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be? (2016)Scientific foundations and current state of trace evidence—A review (2020)Practical Solutions to Cognitive and Human Factor Challenges in Forensic Science (2013)Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners (2016)In the pursuit of the holy grail of forensic science – Spectroscopic studies on the estimation of time since deposition of bloodstains (2018)Evidence evaluation: A response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T (2011)On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect (2014)Current perspectives in the interpretation of gunshot residues in forensic science: A review (2016)Identification of gunshot residue: a critical review (2001)Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems (2011)A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation (2016)Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part I: Forensic intelligence (2009)Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part II: Intelligence and crime scene examination (2010)Expanding forensic science through forensic intelligence (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists567 cited
  • 1998A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework454 cited
  • 1998A model for case assessment and interpretation299 cited
  • 2009Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion252 cited
  • 2000More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions177 cited
  • 2011Expressing evaluative opinions: A position statement116 cited
  • 2011Scale of conclusions for the value of evidence84 cited
  • 2013Handbook of Forensic Science82 cited
  • 2010Understanding of forensic expert reports by judges, defense lawyers and forensic professionals63 cited
  • 2010Fundamentals of probability and statistical evidence in criminal proceedings: guidance for judges, lawyers, forensic scientists and expert witnesses58 cited
  • 2010Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion Association of Forensic Science Providers55 cited
  • 2018A Framework for Interpreting Evidence39 cited
  • 2012Reservations about likelihood ratios (and some other aspects of forensic 'Bayesianism')34 cited
  • 2013The Bayesian approach to forensic evidence: Evaluating, communicating, and distributing responsibility32 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1965Applications of Probability Theory in Criminalistics, II31 cited
  • 2013The psychology of interpreting expert evaluative opinions28 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2015Lead isotope ratios for bullets, forensic evaluation in a Bayesian paradigm9 cited