SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reported Characteristics of Participants in Physical Therapy–Related Clinical Trials
3 references·0 citing·16 second hopsampled
Reported Characteristics of Participants in Physical Therapy–Related Clinical Trials (2015)Reported Characteristics of Participants …Many Randomized Trials of Physical Therapy Interventions Are Not Adequately Registered: A Survey of 200 Published Trials (2012)Many Randomized Trials of Phy…CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and EMBASE Are the Most Comprehensive Databases Indexing Randomized Controlled Trials of Physical Therapy Interventions (2010)CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and E…Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials (2003)Reliability of the PEDro Scal…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study (2009)A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results (2017)Evaluation of Journal Registration Policies and Prospective Registration of Randomized Clinical Trials of Nonregulated Health Care Interventions (2019)Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses (2023)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)The Cochrane Library (2005)INVITED COMMENTARY: Rating the Quality of Trials in Systematic Reviews of Physical Therapy Interventions (2010)Reproducibility of the Portuguese version of the PEDro Scale (2011)Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews – are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders? (2016)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2003Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials4,799 cited
  • 2010CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and EMBASE Are the Most Comprehensive Databases Indexing Randomized Controlled Trials of Physical Therapy Interventions108 cited
  • 2012Many Randomized Trials of Physical Therapy Interventions Are Not Adequately Registered: A Survey of 200 Published Trials51 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work