How To Be a Peer Reviewer: A Guide for Recent and Soon-to-be PhDs

Beth Miller · Jon C. W. Pevehouse · Ron Rogowski · Dustin H. Tingley · Rick K. Wilson

15 citations0/0 files storedPS Political Science & Politics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Political Science Research and Education

Abstract

Abstract Peer review is central to political science. In this article we collect the ideas of journal editors in political science and several recent PhDs, who met as a panel at the 2011 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting to discuss the principles of the review process. This includes why reviewing is important to the development of one's own scholarship but also offers some nuts and bolts on reviewing.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 15 citations exist upstream.

References

2003HOW TO REVIEW A PAPER 2011Reviewing Manuscripts for Peer-Review Journals: A Primer for Novice and Seasoned Reviewers 2008Editorial: How to Write Effective Reviews for the Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2007Twelve Tips for Reviewers

Cited by

2016Uma Análise Comparativa dos Fatores de Rejeição nos Periódicos de Diferentes Estratos de Administração

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.