SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How To Be a Peer Reviewer: A Guide for Recent and Soon-to-be PhDs
4 references·1 citing·23 second hop
How To Be a Peer Reviewer: A Guide for Recent and Soon-to-be PhDs (2013)How To Be a Peer Reviewer: A Guide for Re…Reviewing Manuscripts for Peer-Review Journals: A Primer for Novice and Seasoned Reviewers (2011)Reviewing Manuscripts for Pee…Editorial: How to Write Effective Reviews for the Journal of Pediatric Psychology (2008)Editorial: How to Write Effec…Twelve Tips for Reviewers (2007)Twelve Tips for ReviewersHOW TO REVIEW A PAPER (2003)HOW TO REVIEW A PAPERUma Análise Comparativa dos Fatores de Rejeição nos Periódicos de Diferentes Estratos de Administração (2016)Uma Análise Comparativa dos F…But the reviewers are making different criticisms of my paper! Diversity and uniqueness in reviewer comments. (1990)What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts? (1998)Editorial: How to Write More Effective, User-Friendly Reviews for the Journal of Pediatric Psychology (2010)Revisar un artículo para Radiología: quién y cómo (2011)Writing Quality Peer Reviews of Research Manuscripts (2015)Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. (1951)Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers (1975)Peer review in health sciences (2002)Reviewing the review process: Identifying sources of delay (2012)Rewarding Peer Reviewers - Maintaining the Integrity of Science Communication (2015)Peer review and the publication process (2016)What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for Assessing Peer Reviews of Manuscripts (1999)Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)Ethics and scientific publication (2005)Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Handbook (2008)Perceptions of Ethical Problems with Scientific Journal Peer Review: An Exploratory Study (2008)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys (2003)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Indexação de Periódicos e a Política de Avaliação Científica: uma análise do campo de administração, contabilidade e turismo no Brasil (2019)Analisando a colaboração e produção científica da área ensino e pesquisa em Administração e Contabilidade (2020)The More You Know (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003HOW TO REVIEW A PAPER143 cited
  • 2011Reviewing Manuscripts for Peer-Review Journals: A Primer for Novice and Seasoned Reviewers125 cited
  • 2008Editorial: How to Write Effective Reviews for the Journal of Pediatric Psychology17 cited
  • 2007Twelve Tips for Reviewers16 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Uma Análise Comparativa dos Fatores de Rejeição nos Periódicos de Diferentes Estratos de Administração13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work