Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Role of Auditors' Emotions and Moods on Audit Judgment: A Research Summary with Suggested Practice Implications

16 references·1 citing·54 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2015Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change4,993 cited
1995Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM).3,469 cited
2000The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits2,870 cited
1994Affective causes and consequences of social information processing.821 cited
1994Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis.598 cited
2001Towards a Process Model of Individual Change in Organizations405 cited
1999The Effect of Experience on the Use of Irrelevant Evidence in Auditor Judgment196 cited
2001Improving Jurors' Evaluations of Auditors in Negligence Cases172 cited
2002The impact of affective information on the professional judgments of more experienced and less experienced auditors119 cited
1994The Effects of Hindsight Bias on Jurors' Evaluations of Auditor Decisions114 cited
1997The Mitigation of Hindsight Bias in Judges' Evaluation of Auditor Decisions.110 cited
2008The Effect of Moods on Auditors’ Inventory Valuation Decisions97 cited
2009The Impact of Positive and Negative Mood on the Hypothesis Generation and Ethical Judgments of Auditors85 cited
2008The Influence of Auditor Experience on the Persuasiveness of Information Provided by Management84 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2010Negative Affect: A Consequence of Multiple Accountabilities in Auditing73 cited

2011The Interplay of Interpersonal Affect and Source Reliability on Auditors’ Inventory Judgments*69 cited

Cited by

2014How Audit Reviewers Respond to an Audit Preparer's Affective Bias: The Ironic Rebound Effect33 cited